jkid169
07-17 02:00 PM
It seems that this guy is trying to do the same thing
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wpf/thread/f61a5163- d893-4545-9f29-863bbd0c710a (http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wpf/thread/f61a5163-%20d893-4545-9f29-863bbd0c710a)
I tried the suggestion solution: convert all the extensions to xps, then use DocumentViewer to display the file. It's quite neat. Short and simple code!
However, the adding comment part still remains to be solved...
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wpf/thread/f61a5163- d893-4545-9f29-863bbd0c710a (http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wpf/thread/f61a5163-%20d893-4545-9f29-863bbd0c710a)
I tried the suggestion solution: convert all the extensions to xps, then use DocumentViewer to display the file. It's quite neat. Short and simple code!
However, the adding comment part still remains to be solved...
wallpaper Free desktop backgrounds
rbkrao
06-29 01:11 PM
Divyendu Sinha was beaten to death while he was out on a walk with his family near his
home in South New Jersey. He holds a PhD and was a professor and author of computer
Science books.
Old Bridge man who was attacked by teenagers dies from injuries | NJ.com (http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/06/old_bridge_man_who_was_attacke.html)
Three teenagers arrested in beating of Old Bridge man | NJ.com (http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/06/three_arrested_in_group_beatin.html)
home in South New Jersey. He holds a PhD and was a professor and author of computer
Science books.
Old Bridge man who was attacked by teenagers dies from injuries | NJ.com (http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/06/old_bridge_man_who_was_attacke.html)
Three teenagers arrested in beating of Old Bridge man | NJ.com (http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/06/three_arrested_in_group_beatin.html)
gene77
07-01 11:52 PM
Ok Guys enough "PREDECTIONS" now go to bed.
Only the coming days will tell us what is going on and what will happen. Everything else is just hear-say.
Go to sleep and remember that we DO have day jobs.
Thanks eb3_nepa, I agree.
Only the coming days will tell us what is going on and what will happen. Everything else is just hear-say.
Go to sleep and remember that we DO have day jobs.
Thanks eb3_nepa, I agree.
2011 dresses HDR Desktop Girls
gcslave
07-02 07:23 PM
Wife got FP notice yesterday. None for me or my daughter. USCIS now has a new procedure where they will update the criminal background check without new fingerprints, unless old FP are unusable for whatever reason....That means no GC until end of July with all the remaining processing :(
Was hoping to be out of this agony earlier.......
Hopefully no retrogression in Aug.
Was hoping to be out of this agony earlier.......
Hopefully no retrogression in Aug.
more...
maverick_joe
05-07 01:13 PM
you should be able to find it from your labor
Hi
Can any one help me in getting information on Onet Code?Is there any website has that information?
thanks
kp
Hi
Can any one help me in getting information on Onet Code?Is there any website has that information?
thanks
kp
starscream
06-06 10:29 AM
Below is a decsription of this amendment from AILA document which lists all the amendments that were discussed yesterday
http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=22584
It confirms that the amendment #1231 applies to Y visa only. On the Senate discussion thread yesterday when this amedment was being discussed some body mentioned something along the lines that that Sen. Kennedy said he supported employer recruitment for all jobs and that really scared me ... I think Sen. Kennedy might have been referring to jobs that require the Y visa
This amendment does not mention anything on H1Bs. There was a lot of discussion on this point yesterday. I think we can breathe a litlle easy now.
The CIR does have other restrictions on H1B like $5000 more fees, restrictions for consulting companies & non-disaplacement clause but I don't think any GC type LABOR CERTIFICATION is required.
From the aila doc:
Durbin Amendment (#1231) to Remove DOL-Determined Labor Shortages as an Exception to Y Visa Recruitment Requirements
Senator Durbin (D-IL) introduced an amendment that eliminates DOL-determined labor shortages as an exception to employer recruitment requirements for Y visas. Senator Durbin argued that the amendment is an attempt to require that jobs be offered to Americans before they are offered to Y visa holders in the new worker program. Removing the provision in the underlying bill allowing the Secretary of Labor to declare labor shortages, he said, would achieve this, since all employers who use the Y visa program would always be required to offer jobs to Americans first. Senator Durbin cited the AFL-CIO as a strong supporter of his measure. Senator Grassley (R-IA), a co-sponsor of the amendment, also expressed his support for the amendment.
Senator Specter argued in response that this amendment is simply unnecessary, since American workers and their wages are already protected under the law. Senator Kennedy, however, expressed support for the amendment. He agreed with the general principle that a measure protecting American workers is good for the country. Ensuring that new Y visa workers don’t encroach upon American jobs or affect American wages, he said, is a step in that direction.
The amendment was agreed to by a vote of 71-22.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=22584
It confirms that the amendment #1231 applies to Y visa only. On the Senate discussion thread yesterday when this amedment was being discussed some body mentioned something along the lines that that Sen. Kennedy said he supported employer recruitment for all jobs and that really scared me ... I think Sen. Kennedy might have been referring to jobs that require the Y visa
This amendment does not mention anything on H1Bs. There was a lot of discussion on this point yesterday. I think we can breathe a litlle easy now.
The CIR does have other restrictions on H1B like $5000 more fees, restrictions for consulting companies & non-disaplacement clause but I don't think any GC type LABOR CERTIFICATION is required.
From the aila doc:
Durbin Amendment (#1231) to Remove DOL-Determined Labor Shortages as an Exception to Y Visa Recruitment Requirements
Senator Durbin (D-IL) introduced an amendment that eliminates DOL-determined labor shortages as an exception to employer recruitment requirements for Y visas. Senator Durbin argued that the amendment is an attempt to require that jobs be offered to Americans before they are offered to Y visa holders in the new worker program. Removing the provision in the underlying bill allowing the Secretary of Labor to declare labor shortages, he said, would achieve this, since all employers who use the Y visa program would always be required to offer jobs to Americans first. Senator Durbin cited the AFL-CIO as a strong supporter of his measure. Senator Grassley (R-IA), a co-sponsor of the amendment, also expressed his support for the amendment.
Senator Specter argued in response that this amendment is simply unnecessary, since American workers and their wages are already protected under the law. Senator Kennedy, however, expressed support for the amendment. He agreed with the general principle that a measure protecting American workers is good for the country. Ensuring that new Y visa workers don’t encroach upon American jobs or affect American wages, he said, is a step in that direction.
The amendment was agreed to by a vote of 71-22.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
more...
BumbleBee
08-15 01:41 PM
Yes lonemetro,
You can re-use priority date established on first I-140 for any sub-sequent I-140 filling. As I understand from your post, you have EB3 labor approved and have just filed for I-140 based on it.
Now, parent company wants to transfer you. Generally I would think you should be able to transfer and still have your GC process going if the company indeed is a 'parent company' but seems there is something different here.
As a general rule, as long as your previously approved I-140 remained approved, you can re-use priority date established for that I-140 for any subsequent I-140 petition. The sub-sequent petition can be with any employer, and yes, you would need a new labor to file that new I-140 :)
Try EB1 or EB2 this time :cool:
BumbleBee
You can re-use priority date established on first I-140 for any sub-sequent I-140 filling. As I understand from your post, you have EB3 labor approved and have just filed for I-140 based on it.
Now, parent company wants to transfer you. Generally I would think you should be able to transfer and still have your GC process going if the company indeed is a 'parent company' but seems there is something different here.
As a general rule, as long as your previously approved I-140 remained approved, you can re-use priority date established for that I-140 for any subsequent I-140 petition. The sub-sequent petition can be with any employer, and yes, you would need a new labor to file that new I-140 :)
Try EB1 or EB2 this time :cool:
BumbleBee
2010 girl desktop wallpaper.
JunRN
09-26 02:38 PM
That remains to be seen. Congress cannot act in a mere speculation that there will be spierce competition between EU and US on skilled labor. US still attracts a lot of foreign skills. Increasing the number is not always seen as a solution but streamlining is or efficiency in adjudication is.
Anothe problem is that US thought it is adding more into the work force everyyear by giving out immigrant visas (EB). This is wrong because most of the applicants are already in the workforce under H1B and their dependents. What EB visas do was to retain these foreign skills by giving them permanent residence status. Therefore, EB visas are there not to add into the workforce but to maintain the current workforce.
The real visas for adding into the workforce is the H1B, which is temporary and only 65,000 per year which in a week time was used up.
Anothe problem is that US thought it is adding more into the work force everyyear by giving out immigrant visas (EB). This is wrong because most of the applicants are already in the workforce under H1B and their dependents. What EB visas do was to retain these foreign skills by giving them permanent residence status. Therefore, EB visas are there not to add into the workforce but to maintain the current workforce.
The real visas for adding into the workforce is the H1B, which is temporary and only 65,000 per year which in a week time was used up.
more...
justted
12-27 08:15 PM
Hello :)
I am currently looking for art and graphics for my vitual pet site and would like to know if you would like to join us.
We really need some maps, items, pets and other objects made that are unique.
Please feel free to check it out at http://cyberpetcity.com or contact me here! :)
Kind Regards
Justin
I am currently looking for art and graphics for my vitual pet site and would like to know if you would like to join us.
We really need some maps, items, pets and other objects made that are unique.
Please feel free to check it out at http://cyberpetcity.com or contact me here! :)
Kind Regards
Justin
hair france desktop wallpaper
Biking
05-24 12:22 PM
I wish nobody answers your question even if they knew. How does your question relate to your thread heading?? It is really bad when people start posting catching headings and then post something that is not at all connected.
Thank you very much for catching this....
Thank you very much for catching this....
more...
rockdanation
03-13 08:32 PM
the question is how can i file my own 485 when i don't have details about I140. Is there a way where by i can get this info. i need SRC number to file for my 485 and i am current. i am on EB2 , other country not India, China .
thanks
thanks
hot house Anime Desktop wallpaper
rameshk75
12-06 08:15 AM
How do you know that name check and background were completed in October? Did you call USCIS?
more...
house Girls Desktop Wallpapers
rockstart
07-20 08:32 PM
Spoke to Virgin Atlantic cust rep last week for flight from US to India via London and they said they cannot accept Advance Parole for transit and I would need UK Transit Visa or Valid US visa.
tattoo Desktop wallpapers with sexy
poise2000
07-30 01:11 PM
an local govenment gave me an offer but the salary is lower than prevailing wage around that area shown in the DOL. Would it be a big problem for H1b application next year? It is impossible to increase the salary because the working location is not rich in that area.
I heard that I can hire some survey company to get a lower salary survey for the specific location which can be used to apply H1b, is it correct? Thanks
Should I accept this offer? I have searched jobs for 6 months and only have this offer. Thanks for your suggestion.
I heard that I can hire some survey company to get a lower salary survey for the specific location which can be used to apply H1b, is it correct? Thanks
Should I accept this offer? I have searched jobs for 6 months and only have this offer. Thanks for your suggestion.
more...
pictures Desktop Girls Wallpaper
mihird
09-06 05:59 PM
I started my 10 hr./week part time job 2 years back (I was 4 years on my primary H1 by then). We filed a 2nd H1 and had no problems getting it approved - we got a 2 year approval aligned with the primary H1s 6 year expiry..
My both, the primary H1 and the 2nd H1 are up for renewal in Jan 07 & April 07 respectively and I am also up on the 6 years on my H1 by then.
I have an approved I-140 from my primary H1.
I have a question which I hope someone can help me answer. Will the 2nd H1 also qualify for the 3 year extensions, just like the primary H1 based on the I-140 approval on the primary H1?
I am guessing yes (it sounds logical to me), but am not sure...can anyone confirm?
My both, the primary H1 and the 2nd H1 are up for renewal in Jan 07 & April 07 respectively and I am also up on the 6 years on my H1 by then.
I have an approved I-140 from my primary H1.
I have a question which I hope someone can help me answer. Will the 2nd H1 also qualify for the 3 year extensions, just like the primary H1 based on the I-140 approval on the primary H1?
I am guessing yes (it sounds logical to me), but am not sure...can anyone confirm?
dresses cute ackgrounds for girls
phillyag
05-19 03:10 PM
Yates memo dated May 12, 2005 - is it still valid and has there been any change to it since its out ?
I want to specifically focus on the following question:
Question 8. Can an alien port to self-employment under INA � 204(j)?
Answer: Yes, as long as the requirements are met. First, the key is whether the employment is in a "same or similar" occupational classification as the job for which the original I-140 petition was filed. Second, it may be appropriate to confirm that the new employer and the job offer are legitimate through an RFE to the adjustment applicant for relevant information about these issues. Third, as with any portability case, USCIS will focus on whether the I-140 petition represented the truly intended employment at the time of the filing of both the I-140 and the I-485. This means that, as of the time of the filing of the I-140 and at the time of filing the I-485 if not filed concurrently, the I-140 petitioner must have had the intent to employ the beneficiary, and the alien must have intended to undertake the employment, upon adjustment. Adjudicators should not presume absence of such intent and may take the I-140 and supporting documents themselves as prima facie evidence of such intent, but in appropriate cases additional evidence or investigation may be appropriate.
Does this still hold good ? And if it does can someone help me understand the criteria mentioned here. Too much of technical jargon
I want to specifically focus on the following question:
Question 8. Can an alien port to self-employment under INA � 204(j)?
Answer: Yes, as long as the requirements are met. First, the key is whether the employment is in a "same or similar" occupational classification as the job for which the original I-140 petition was filed. Second, it may be appropriate to confirm that the new employer and the job offer are legitimate through an RFE to the adjustment applicant for relevant information about these issues. Third, as with any portability case, USCIS will focus on whether the I-140 petition represented the truly intended employment at the time of the filing of both the I-140 and the I-485. This means that, as of the time of the filing of the I-140 and at the time of filing the I-485 if not filed concurrently, the I-140 petitioner must have had the intent to employ the beneficiary, and the alien must have intended to undertake the employment, upon adjustment. Adjudicators should not presume absence of such intent and may take the I-140 and supporting documents themselves as prima facie evidence of such intent, but in appropriate cases additional evidence or investigation may be appropriate.
Does this still hold good ? And if it does can someone help me understand the criteria mentioned here. Too much of technical jargon
more...
makeup Asian Girl desktop wallpaper :
linklinklink
06-25 02:53 PM
For those who have same problem.
I just come back from local USCIS office. They do not make changes on I-94 any more ( I did show the memo whick is outdated according to the office). Now it's direct mail service. The supervisor of the office confirmed that I do not need file I-102 form if I file I-485 to adjust status, but I do need copies of all my I-94s including the error one. Good luck to anyone.
I just come back from local USCIS office. They do not make changes on I-94 any more ( I did show the memo whick is outdated according to the office). Now it's direct mail service. The supervisor of the office confirmed that I do not need file I-102 form if I file I-485 to adjust status, but I do need copies of all my I-94s including the error one. Good luck to anyone.
girlfriend desktop wallpaper women.
needhelp!
10-16 01:07 PM
from the front seat
hairstyles Desktop Wallpaper Girls 14
Blog Feeds
07-15 03:01 PM
A frequent question that arises is whether a foreign national living in the United States for a certain number of years can obtain permanent residency based on the years of living in the United States. There is no law or regulation currently in place allowing foreign nationals to automatically obtain permanent residency based on the number of years residing in the United States. There are however, many ways foreign nationals can immigrate and obtain permanent resident status. Two ways to obtain permanent resident status are based on employment and family sponsorship.
One of the ways foreign nationals can obtain permanent residency is based on employment. The U.S. employer will sponsor the employee to qualify under a certain visa category. Specifically, the foreign national may qualify under one or more of the employment-based “EB” visa preference categories that are divided into four separate categories.
The four EB visa preference categories are:
EB-1: Extraordinary Ability, Professors, Researches, or Executives, filed on form I-140
EB-2: Exceptional Ability in the Sciences, Arts or Business, filed on form I-140
EB-3: Skilled Worker, Professional, Or Unskilled Worker, filed on form I-140
EB-4: Immigrant Religious Worker, filed on form I-360
Another process to obtain lawful permanent residence in the U.S. is through family sponsorship. That is, either a U.S. citizen or permanent resident family member or as a fiancé to a U.S. citizen and subsequent marriage. The process begins by either the U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident relative filing form I-130 Petition for Alien Relative or form I-129F Petition for Alien Fiance with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS). Just as in employment-based sponsorship, there are visa preference categories in family-based sponsorship. Family-based “FB” preference categories are divided into four categories.
FB-1: Unmarried sons and daughters of U.S. Citizens
FB-2A: Spouses and children of lawful permanent residents of the U.S.
FB-2B: unmarried sons and daughters of permanent residents of the U.S.
FB-3: Married sons and daughters of U.S. Citizens.
FB-4: Brothers and sisters of U.S. Citizens who are at least 21 years old.
The above preference categories are subject to a numerical limitation. More information on these visa categories is available at the U.S. Department of State’s visa bulletin at: www.travel.state.gov (http://www.travel.state.gov)
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/PKEE1gLIodw/)
One of the ways foreign nationals can obtain permanent residency is based on employment. The U.S. employer will sponsor the employee to qualify under a certain visa category. Specifically, the foreign national may qualify under one or more of the employment-based “EB” visa preference categories that are divided into four separate categories.
The four EB visa preference categories are:
EB-1: Extraordinary Ability, Professors, Researches, or Executives, filed on form I-140
EB-2: Exceptional Ability in the Sciences, Arts or Business, filed on form I-140
EB-3: Skilled Worker, Professional, Or Unskilled Worker, filed on form I-140
EB-4: Immigrant Religious Worker, filed on form I-360
Another process to obtain lawful permanent residence in the U.S. is through family sponsorship. That is, either a U.S. citizen or permanent resident family member or as a fiancé to a U.S. citizen and subsequent marriage. The process begins by either the U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident relative filing form I-130 Petition for Alien Relative or form I-129F Petition for Alien Fiance with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS). Just as in employment-based sponsorship, there are visa preference categories in family-based sponsorship. Family-based “FB” preference categories are divided into four categories.
FB-1: Unmarried sons and daughters of U.S. Citizens
FB-2A: Spouses and children of lawful permanent residents of the U.S.
FB-2B: unmarried sons and daughters of permanent residents of the U.S.
FB-3: Married sons and daughters of U.S. Citizens.
FB-4: Brothers and sisters of U.S. Citizens who are at least 21 years old.
The above preference categories are subject to a numerical limitation. More information on these visa categories is available at the U.S. Department of State’s visa bulletin at: www.travel.state.gov (http://www.travel.state.gov)
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/PKEE1gLIodw/)
makemygc
07-02 08:56 AM
I guess he went to bed on Thursday and woke up today.
martinvisalaw
01-26 10:37 AM
He is out of status if the L-1 employer no longer exists or he is not working for that company. If the position still existed, he would be maintaining status even though the L-1 I-94 has expired, if the extension was filed before the I-94 expired. However, the issue isn't the late filing of the extension, it's the fact that he is not working for the company and really had no basis for filing an extension.
Having the extension pending means that he is not accruing unlawful presence (something that could subject him to a bar from the US), however he needs to rectify his status rather than rely on an inappropriate L-1. If he trusts his immigration lawyer, he should discuss the options with her/him.
Having the extension pending means that he is not accruing unlawful presence (something that could subject him to a bar from the US), however he needs to rectify his status rather than rely on an inappropriate L-1. If he trusts his immigration lawyer, he should discuss the options with her/him.
No comments:
Post a Comment